lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How make "piece" behave?


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: How make "piece" behave?
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:58:33 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Bernhard Kleine <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 22.10.2017 um 22:11 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Bernhard Kleine <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I have Missa Brevis KV 259 and so far 6 input files where the header is
>>>
>>>> \header {
>>>>   piece = "Sanctus"
>>>> }
>>>  the master file is \version "2.19.49"
>>>> \language "deutsch"
>>>>  #(set-global-staff-size 15)
>>>>
>>>> \header {
>>>>   title = "Missa brevis in C"
>>>>   subtitle = "Orgelsolo-Messe"
>>>>   subsubtitle = "für Soli, Chor, Orchester und Orgel"
>>>>   composer = "Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart"
>>>>   opus = "KV 259"
>>>> }
>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_Kyrie.ly"
>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_Gloria.ly"
>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_Sanctus.ly"
>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_Benedictus.ly"
>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_AgnusDei.ly"
>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_DonaNobisPacem.ly"
>>> Strange thing is that all pieces are labeled "Dona nobis pacem", the
>>> name of the very last piece. A previous Missa von Bruckner where the
>>> above file was taken from had not this problem. Please advice how to get
>>> it correct.
>> I suggest you look for structural differences in the respective included
>> files.  I am pretty sure that this is not the fault of the composer
>> being Mozart.
>>
> You are correct that Mr. Mozart never worked with files. However, I
> noticed that the Bruckner pieces had a ( last) line:
> % -*- master: Anton-Bruckner-Messe-in-C.ly;
>
> Applying this line and changing it to
> % -*- master: Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C.ly

That's a comment for the sake of the editor.  It is not relevant for
LilyPond.

> didnot change the strange behaviour that all pieces are labeled Dona
> nobis pacem. What else did I miss?

I suggest you look for _structural_ differences in the respective
included files.  How is the music organized with your Mozart, how is it
organized with your Bruckner?  LilyPond does not mind the different
composers, but you obviously have a difference in what constructs your
repective music passages appear in.

Are they all in a \score of their own?  Do those \score constructs have
a \header of their own?

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]