Re: printing the current moment in a context

[David Kastrup]

Jan-Peter Voigt <address@hidden> writes:

> ... OK, now I found it!
>
> It is a matter of order: If the edition-engraver is consisted before
> the Timing the timing-information is not updated and so the last
> reported timestep is used in the start-translation-timestep slot of
> the engraver. A lot of the mods are applied in that stage of
> translation.
>
> So if you move the timing engravers *before* consisting the EE, the
> mods are applied at the right timestep.
>
> I don't know, if it is possible to change the order of
> engravers/translators after they have been consisted. But I hope this
> info helps for now.

Sounds like it would make sense to set "must-be-last" to #t in your
engraver definition.

-- 
David Kastrup