[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: opus conflict
From: |
Mark Stephen Mrotek |
Subject: |
RE: opus conflict |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Apr 2017 14:09:50 -0700 |
Thomas,
Thank you for the alternatives. Since I have very limited knowledge as to how
to customize (write Lilypond), I shall opt for 1) or 2).
The result is more important than the method.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Morley [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 12:34 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek <address@hidden>
Cc: lilypond-user <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: opus conflict
2017-04-30 21:04 GMT+02:00 Mark Stephen Mrotek <address@hidden>:
> Thomas,
>
> Thank you for your detailed explanation. Your patient effort is appreciated.
> As I understand now, some of the header fields are controlled by the \book
> and some by the \score.
> Your colored version is very illustrative, yet note that the "opus" is under
> the first piece (subtitle) and not under the composer where I want it to be.
This happens because the complete bookTitleMarkup is printed first by the
scoreTitleMarkup (if print-all-headers = ##t). The remaining parts of the
score-header are printed below (i.e. piece and opus).
> That is where I have always seen it in my limited experience.
>
> Woodland Sketches
>
> E. MacDowell
>
>
> Op. 51
>
> To a Wild Rose
>
> Will o' the Wisp
>
> Is this possible with Lilypond?
>
> Mark
>
Sure. At least three possibilities
(1) quick'n dirty
arranger = "Op. 51"
(2) quick'n dirty
composer = \markup \right-column { "E. MacDowell" "Op. 51" }
(3) go for custom book/scoreTitleMarkup
I'd really recommend (3).
You are not happy with the default, so why not change it?
Timothy already posted a possibility.
If you like it, ok. If you want some changes and feel not confident enough to
implement them yourself, ask back.
Cheers,
Harm