Re: grouping in 6/8

[Michael Käppler]

Hi Karol,
it depends on which rhythmical structure you want to express.
If you intend a base structure in 8ths where the 4th note is not 
stressed, I would prefer (2).
If you want to achieve a base structure in dotted 8ths, like a 12/16 
signature divided in four beats, I would write (1).

HTH,
Michael

Am 23.04.2017 um 21:52 schrieb Karol Majewski:
> Hi, which grouping is better:
>
> 6/8: c16 c16 c16 c8.~ c4.
>
> or
>
> 6/8: c16 c16 c6 c16~ c8~ c4.
>
>
> Couldn't find the answer in "Behind Bars".
>
> -Best
> KM
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user