[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: brittenPhrygolydian
From: |
David Nalesnik |
Subject: |
Re: brittenPhrygolydian |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:14:34 -0600 |
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:17 AM, David Nalesnik
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Kieren MacMillan
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>> I understand that there are a huge number of possible key signatures, but
>> can’t the collision in the first example (does it bother anyone else?) be
>> "pre-fixed" somehow?
>>
>
> There could be a more sophisticated grading of KeySignature.padding in
> lily/key-signature-interface.cc, perhaps based on glyph extent.
>
Scrap the glyph-extent suggestion.
You'd probably need to adjust padding based on certain juxtapositions.
Maybe there's something possible with horizontal skylines, but I
wouldn't know.
DN
- brittenPhrygolydian, Simon Albrecht, 2017/01/17
- Re: brittenPhrygolydian, Simon Albrecht, 2017/01/17
- Re: brittenPhrygolydian, Kieren MacMillan, 2017/01/18
- Re: brittenPhrygolydian, tisimst, 2017/01/18
- Message not available
- Fwd: brittenPhrygolydian, David Nalesnik, 2017/01/18
- Re: brittenPhrygolydian, Kieren MacMillan, 2017/01/18
- Re: brittenPhrygolydian, David Nalesnik, 2017/01/18
- Re: brittenPhrygolydian,
David Nalesnik <=
- Re: brittenPhrygolydian, Noeck, 2017/01/18
- Re: brittenPhrygolydian, Thomas Morley, 2017/01/18
- Re: brittenPhrygolydian, Noeck, 2017/01/19
- Re: brittenPhrygolydian, Simon Albrecht, 2017/01/19
Re: brittenPhrygolydian, Hans Åberg, 2017/01/18