[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: openLilyLib
|
From: |
Urs Liska |
|
Subject: |
Re: openLilyLib |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:29:05 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
Am 17.11.2016 um 00:24 schrieb Noeck:
> ... I successfully used the edition-engraver writing:
>
> \include "edition-engraver/edition-engraver.ily"
>
> But I don't see the benefit of oll-core that way.
Apart from the fact that this should be renamed to
"edition-engraver/package.ily" it's not *you* as a user that will see
the direct benefit. The benefit is that "edition-engraver" is now a
tangible unit (a repo) that can have an explicit maintainer, a dedicated
issue tracker and an individual list of people with push access.
(I pulled this mail because the other one takes substantially longer to
reply to)
Urs
> What am I supposed to do?
>
> Cheers,
> Joram
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user