[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Notational conventions
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Notational conventions |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:22:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>> On 9 Nov 2016, at 15:39, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On a 5-row
>> instrument, you can always adjust your fingering using the redundant
>> help rows in order to be trilling on non-adjacent buttons, making it
>> easier to have a nice pizzaz. On my 4-row instrument, some trills
>> require trilling on adjacent buttons, and this piece's voice
>> distribution makes it hard to use anything but 3-4 fingering here.
>
> I couldn't tell for buttons, but with full scale keyboard, is normally
> an advantage with adjacent, or close together, keys.
We are talking about 7.5cm/octave here, so a horizontal escapement of
0.625cm per semitone. Since the notes are in staggered rows, the actual
distance is more like that of horizontally adjacent buttons, namely
7.5cm/4 = 1.875cm but in a sort-of diagonal direction.
> Also, one can switch fingers during an ornament, but I do not know if
> it is done on accordions.
Switching fingers is tends to be done more than on piano (even when
using a piano accordion keyboard) since the instrument exposes the key
release much more prominently than a percussive instrument like a piano
does. It is more similar to harmonium and organ with regard to some
articulation issues. Of course, a button provides a smaller area for
switching.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Notational conventions, (continued)
- Re: Notational conventions, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/08
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, David Kastrup, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, David Kastrup, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, David Kastrup, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, David Kastrup, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, David Kastrup, 2016/11/09
- Re: Notational conventions, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/09