[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator
From: |
mclaren |
Subject: |
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Nov 2016 19:50:05 -0700 (MST) |
Well, the 3's indicate 3:2 broken tuplets. There seems to be some controversy
over whether Tobin Chodos really wanted a single 3:2 eighth note at the end
of every measure. If he does, then the 3's are correct. If he doesn't, then
the question was unclear and we're answering something that wasn't asked.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/compound-time-signature-with-non-duple-denominator-tp195829p196116.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, (continued)
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/02
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Martin Neubauer, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator,
mclaren <=
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Tobin Chodos, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/04
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/04
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/04
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/04
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/04
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03