[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Beginner's questions about long repeats & MIDI files
From: |
David Wright |
Subject: |
Re: Beginner's questions about long repeats & MIDI files |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Oct 2016 20:33:48 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri 14 Oct 2016 at 16:41:31 (-0700), Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote:
> > 4.) What's the proper way to write the following:
> >
> > c4 <c d>4 <c d e>4
> >
> > when c's duration is actually "2." (a single button press) and d's
> > duration is "2" (again a single button press)? Should one draw c2. or
> > three c4, connected with a tie/slur?
> >
>
>
> I think there are different approaches to this.
>
> While the 2. makes it clearer that the c2. is one note, not three, it would
> make it ambiguous when the d comes in--unless you do it with parallel
> voices and add a r4 rest. But then you have to deal with tweaking stem and
> rest directions and locations, and this approach doesn't generally work
> well with more than 2 voices.
>
> So, I'd just tie them together.
>
> Although, for this particular set of notes you'd need to do a lot of
> tweaking to get the layout clear. The default output for this cluster is
> pretty lame, with the ties between the c's not being on the same line, and
> the tie between the d's looking like it is a slur from d to e.
>
> The default output looks better for a normal chord.
>
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
>
> \score {
> \header { piece = "Parallel voices" }
> {
> \time 3/4
> << { c'2. } \\ { r4 d'2 } \\ { r2 e'4 } >>
> << { c'2. } \\ { r4 d'2 } \\ { r2 g'4 } >>
> }
> }
>
> \score {
> \header { piece = "Ties" }
> {
> \time 3/4
> c'4 ~ <c' d'>4 ~ <c' d' e'>4
> c'4 ~ <c' e'>4 ~ <c' e' g'>4
> }
> }
How about a compromise?
Cheers,
David.
scrunch.ly
Description: Text document
scrunch.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document