|
From: | Malte Meyn |
Subject: | Re: LilyPond logo? |
Date: | Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:51:44 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 |
Am 06.08.2016 um 17:11 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider:
Plus pdf 2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider < address@hidden>:Logo test enclosed. Cheers, Pierre
My opinions:- #5 is much better than both #3 and #2 (and #1) because it’s more realistic (no overlapping pads, having a gap) and less black. But not 100% convincing either (especially the pad). - #4 is very dark and an even number of petals per layer looks weird (cannot say why, of course five per layer isn’t realistic either) - I like the flower of #6 (but not it’s outline version #7) but I think it would need a better matching (more realistic) pad. This pad matches well with it’s original flower from your first proposal :) - #8 of course would need a pad to recognise it as a water lily rather than a generic flower; this was just a test to demonstrate a more realistic (?) positioning of petals, not a complete logo. Maybe I’ll try to add a pad. - #9 has a similar problem as #6: the styles of the flower (very static) and the pad (a little bit more vivid) don’t really match IMHO
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |