Re: articulate.ly and fingering

[Gianmaria Lari]

Yes, made a mistake. I wanted to say that "some rests are introduced
only in the second measure".

Anyway why this articulate difference between the fingered measure and
the not fingered measure?

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> That doesn't look like a screenshot of the midi output - it has the
> fingerings and also rests in the second measure, whereas you say the rests
> are in the first measure.
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gianmaria Lari"
> <address@hidden>
> To: "lilypond-user" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 9:54 AM
> Subject: articulate.ly and fingering
>
>
>
>> I don't understand the following behavior of articulate.ly.
>>
>> I wrote this measure:
>>
>>    a-1 b-2 a-1 b-2
>>
>> and then the same without fingering:
>>
>>    a b a b
>>
>> The midi output of these two measures looks curious to me, because
>> some rests are introduced ONLY in the first measure. Is it normal?
>>
>> Here it is the whole code and attached the screenshot of the *midi*
>> output.
>>
>> \version "2.19.40"
>> \include "articulate.ly"
>>
>> \score
>> {
>>  \articulate
>>  {
>>    a-1 b-2 a-1 b-2
>>    a b a b
>>  }
>>  \layout {}
>>  \midi { }
>> }
>>
>> gianmaria
>>
>> P.S. Listening the midi output using the frescobaldi midiplayer and
>> setting the instrument to violin makes the difference well
>> discernible.
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>
>