Re: gracenotes and clefs

[Pierre Perol-Schneider]

Hi Martin,

See 'known issues and warnings" here: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/special-rhythmic-concerns

So it'll go:

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\version "2.19.39"

musicA = \relative {
  \clef "treble"
  \acciaccatura b'16
  c4 d e f }

musicB = \relative {
  \clef "bass"
  \grace s16
  c1
}

\score {
  \new PianoStaff <<
    \new Staff { \musicA }
    \new Staff { \musicB }
  >>
  \layout {}
}


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2016-03-04 11:17 GMT+01:00 Martin Tarenskeen <address@hidden>:

Hi, guys

the following example:

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\version "2.16.39"

musicA = \relative {
  \clef "treble"
  \acciaccatura b'16
  c4 d e f }

musicB = \relative {
  \clef "bass" c1
}

\score {
  \new PianoStaff <<
    \new Staff { \musicA }
    \new Staff { \musicB }
  >>
  \layout {}
}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Gives really ugly result for me.
How can I make the lower staff start with a "bass" clef (Which it should do automatically). Is this a a bug or am I doing something wrong?
When I leave away the gracenotes the problem disappears and the lower staff starts with a "bass" clef. (I have tried \grace and \acciaccatura with the same unwanted side-effect)

Another thing that looks suboptimal to my eyes: the acciaccaturaslur in the upper staff collides with the following note.

But it's the lower staff that's really bothering me.

see attachement.

--

MT

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user