[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cross-staff phrase marks
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Cross-staff phrase marks |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:12:57 -0500 |
Hi Carl,
> Slurs are *not* bezier curves; they are bezier sandwiches (meaning they
> have an upper and lower bezier curve, with common endpoints. We would
> need to define a composite bezier sandwich in order to develop proper
> composite curves.
>
> Of course, that could be done.
Good point.
It could still be done right now, using existing features, right? For example
(warning: untested thought-experiment!), by pushing the #’eccentricity of the
left Slur to some large positive number and that of the right Slur to some
large [absolute value] negative number, and compressing the “join segment" of
each Slur (by conflating its control points appropriately), the two sandwiches
could be mashed together into a single reasonable-looking submarine. =)
But there’s no question that it would all be easier done with more robust tools.
Cheers,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden
- Cross-staff phrase marks, Hilary Snaden, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Andrew Bernard, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Simon Albrecht, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Simon Albrecht, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, David Nalesnik, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Carl Sorensen, 2016/02/17
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Cross-staff phrase marks, Andrew Bernard, 2016/02/17