[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Super and sub
From: |
Robert Blackstone |
Subject: |
Re: Super and sub |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Feb 2016 13:45:58 +0100 |
Dear David,
Thank you very much. Perfect. This is what I had hoped for.
I needed some time to find out how to insert "real" LilyPond accidentals
instead of your "♯" but I think I can manage that now.
(Just curious: What is ♯? Not the normal #.)
Best regards,
Robert Blackstone
On 7 Feb 2016, at 11:39 , David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Robert Blackstone <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Just as I was trying to formulate a request for some additional feature
>> related to
>> Super and Sub I saw Joram's mail, the first of this thread, with which I very
>> much agree.
>>
>> So maybe I can use this thread to ask for the following:
>>
>> In comments accompanying some scores I feel a need for BC figures, as shown
>> in these screenshot:. (typeset with ConTeXt, Im not sure this feature exists
>> in
>> LaTeX)
>>
>> *
>> and
>> *
>>
>> Would this be doable in LilyPond ? A sort of unattached Super-Sub couple (and
>> triple)
>> If not, could it somehow be added to its immense reservoir of features?
>
> #(define-markup-command (stack layout props args) (markup-list?)
> (interpret-markup layout props
> #{ \markup \tiny \raise #0.5 \general-align #Y #CENTER
> \override #'(baseline-skip . 2) \right-column #args #}))
>
> \markup { Would be a \stack {6 5 3} on the
> harmonized as \stack { 7 ♯3 } → \stack { 7 5 }, }
>
>
>> (Preferably with LilyPonds own accidentals and perhaps the BC-font.)
>
> Well, what you put in there is up to you.
>
> --
> David Kastrup