[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Beam subdivisions under tuplets
|
From: |
Urs Liska |
|
Subject: |
Re: Beam subdivisions under tuplets |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:07:31 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 |
Am 20.01.2016 um 18:45 schrieb Kieren MacMillan:
> Hi Urs,
>
>> shouldn't the subdivisions be rather considering the *written* durations?
>
> That should be the default, IMO.
>
So PLEASE could a few people independently make some checks with 2.19.35
to see if subdivided beams under tuplets do what they should and what
the docs say they do? Tests should include beams fully and partially
under tuplets. And maybe some comparisons to 2.18.2 as well.
I don't want to say more because I want unbiased opinions.
Urs
> Best,
> Kieren.
> ________________________________
>
> Kieren MacMillan, composer
> ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
> ‣ email: address@hidden
>
--
Urs Liska
www.openlilylib.org