[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Dec 2015 02:42:28 +0100 |
2015-12-13 0:16 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Though, I thought about some sort of macro, doing the job like:
>>
>> %% the macro:
>> \simple-define-markup-command
>> %% the args:
>> % name:
>> bold-red
>> % body:
>> \bold \with-color #red \etc
>>
>> I think it would prevent some confusions.
>
> \etc is not a "body". It's a "the last markup command is incomplete,
> defer to its signature for the types of the missing arguments" marker.
> And you have nothing in your "macro" that would actually switch the
> "body" into markup mode. To me, that looks like being harder to explain
> to both compiler and user.
Harder to the compiler? Yes, not hard to imagine.
To the user? I'm not sure. But that's only me.
This is the user-list, though, other users could step in as well...
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, (continued)
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/12/09
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, Thomas Morley, 2015/12/09
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, David Kastrup, 2015/12/10
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, Thomas Morley, 2015/12/10
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, Kieren MacMillan, 2015/12/10
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, David Kastrup, 2015/12/10
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, Thomas Morley, 2015/12/10
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, David Kastrup, 2015/12/11
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, Thomas Morley, 2015/12/12
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, David Kastrup, 2015/12/12
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, Noeck, 2015/12/13
- Re: Lower-case letter rehearsal marks, Johan Vromans, 2015/12/09