lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lilypond teaching material


From: Gilles
Subject: Re: lilypond teaching material
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:15:04 +0200
User-agent: Scarlet Webmail

On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:04:24 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Gilles <address@hidden> writes:

Hello.

On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:49:04 +0200, BB wrote:
I just read


http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/learning/entering-input.html
(again). I find that is a good basis for such an introduction,

IIRC, someone (among the most prominent current or past developers)
once stated that this first example being compilable by lilypond had
been a big mistake.

Well, I think it should specify a note duration for the first note.
Other than that, I find nothing wrong with it.

Perhaps it was meant to show people that text input is not scary.
But its simplicity is deceitful: no actual score is that simple; even
a monophonic instrument part should not be encoded that way.

Hacking down some melody tends to be rather similar to that. Many tunes in abc format look pretty much like that and transfer reasonably well to
LilyPond input of that complexity.

Would someone switch to lilypond just for this kind of work?

I did not to argue in that direction (lesser complex scores), but even so:
where is the title of the tune? ;-)

Gilles




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]