On Aug 8, 2015, at 7:55 PM, Server Acim <address@hidden> wrote:
Hello,
I want to ask you a very important question.
Turkish Music is divide two kinds in it inside.
One of is "Turkish Classical Music". Its roots are based of Ottoman Impire. And
"MAKAM" word is based some series. The title of makams are changed according to its note
that where the serie is begined and ended.
The second sub-genre of "Turkish Music" as an general title, is "Turkish Folk
Music". This is the public's music that are coming from many eras. During the Turkish
Classical Music is performing at the serailles, the folk music of Turkish folk people were singing
their folk songs in villages and towns of Turkey.
So, the "segah" koma(a littile bit lower than flat) sound is used in the key signature
with normal flat sign but added a "2" number above it. We(The Turkish musician who uses
LilyPond for engraving an Turkish Folk Song) need this sign for using it at the engraving project
of a Turkish Folk Song.
I am adding an attachment that includes this flat sign with number "2" in its
key signature. This is taken from the Turkish Folk Song Archive of Turkey Radio and
Television (TRT) Corporation.
This is a very urgent matter. I need to have the solutiong as quick as possible.
How can you help me?
Thank you. Bye.
--
Server ACİM
- Besteci (Composer)
- İnönü Üniversitesi Öğretim Üyesi (Full Professor of Music Composition at
Inonu Universitesi - Malatya - TURKEY)
- Linux Mint Kullanıcısı ve Destekçisi (Linux Mint User and Supporter)
Dear Server,
There is currently no easy way to do this, as the current key signature layout
algorithms use glyphs as a fundamental unit.
That means that you either need to:
1) create your own glyph (moderately difficult)
2) rewrite the logic of the algorithm in Scheme, at which point you can make a
composite stencil of a flat sign and the number two.
#2 is, in a crunch, likely your best bet. I remember someone a while back
wrote custom scheme code to layout key signatures but I forget who and when -
searching online isn’t helping much, so perhaps the person who wrote the code
is reading the thread and could respond?
Cheers,
~MS