|
| From: | N. Andrew Walsh |
| Subject: | Re: garbled output, error |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jun 2015 22:23:12 +0200 |
Am 27.06.2015 um 11:22 schrieb N. Andrew Walsh:
> Hi Urs,
>
> My desktop is a gentoo system which builds directly from the git
> repository (gentoo has something like a "live" package, with a version
> number -9999 at the end, that pulls from the live branch). On my sytem,
> that returns a lily version of 2.19.22.
Oh, interesting.
> My laptop, however, is an ubuntu
> system (never managed to get gentoo working on it, alas!), for which I
> have 2.19.21 installed from the .sh file available on the website.
>
> So, it's probably the case that whatever the issue is will come up again
> when I get home.
Surely.
> If it's any help, a lot of my system fonts now appear
> much sharper (say, in the file manager, or Firefox), which I suspect has
> to do with a recent update to one of the base packages. I'll let you
> know when I get home.
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
Could you please add an issue to
https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/issues
Best
Urs
> A
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Urs Liska <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 27.06.2015 um 11:04 schrieb N. Andrew Walsh:
> > Well, I've now loaded this up on my laptop, and re-cloned the
> > openlilylib directory, and now the problem no longer appears. I have
> > other issues -- namely that my production box is running lilypond
> > 2.19.22, which I can't seem to install from ubuntu -- but those are minor.
>
> 2.19.22 isn't released yet AFAICS. Do you have a custom built LilyPond?
>
> >
> > Urs, did you update something on the git tree, or was this simply a
> > problem on my side that I'll run into again when I get back home?
>
> It's not clear what you say. Do you have a laptop with something <
> 2.19.22 and a home pc with a custom build from the 2.19.22 line?
>
> If that's the case then probably you'll experience the problem at home
> again because the changes in LilyPond have been introduced there.
>
> I assume I'll have to change the implementation (and look for other
> parts where this might matter) and introduce a version switch so the
> code executed from openLilyLib depends on the LilyPond version.
>
> I'm approaching the state to be able to work properly again.
> Unfortunately I have to pick up a presentation for upcoming Wednesday.
> Anyone in or near Karlsruhe BTW?
>
> Urs
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > A
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Urs Liska <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> > <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 26.06.2015 um 23:50 schrieb David Kastrup:
> > > Urs Liska <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>> writes:
> > >
> > >> Oh, I didn't realize this might be for me...
> > >> I'll try to look into it ASAP. But at the moment I don't have a
> > >> working LilyPond at hand.
> > >>
> > >> I have some ideas, though. Maybe openlilylib has to be adapted to a
> > >> recent LilyPond improvement.
> > >
> > > Well, it's probably most reliable if your installation instructions
> > > and/or scripts include a run of convert-ly. Otherwise, there will be
> > > unhappy people with either variant for a long time.
> >
> > I think in the case of openLilyLib I will manually update the code and
> > include a version switch. openLilyLib should in general work with all
> > versions at least since the latest stable release.
> >
> > Users should not do any update/convert-ly themselves, they rather
> > download or 'git pull' updated versions of the library.
> >
> > Urs
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> >
> >
>
>
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |