[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \dim and avoid-slur
|
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
|
Subject: |
Re: \dim and avoid-slur |
|
Date: |
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 11:19:03 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, June 14, 2015 10:05 AM
> "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Simon, you wrote Sunday, June 14, 2015 12:20 AM
>>
>>> And I just noticed that, with outside-staff-priority being
>>> unset for both (or rather, all three), avoid-slur doesn’t have the
>>> desired effect, they will just collide (see attachment). But that would
>>> be a different issue.
>>
> Not really different. This is because dynamics and dynamic spanners
>> are not articulations. "avoid-slur" works only with articulations.
>
> Would it be a reasonable expectation to have it work with dynamics as
> well?
Only if it also worked with dynamic spanners. If it worked with articulations
and dynamics but not with dynamic spanners I think the confusion would
be just as great.
Trevor
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur, (continued)
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur, Klaus Blum, 2015/06/12
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur, David Kastrup, 2015/06/12
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur, Simon Albrecht, 2015/06/13
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur, Trevor Daniels, 2015/06/13
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur, Simon Albrecht, 2015/06/13
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur, Trevor Daniels, 2015/06/13
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur, Simon Albrecht, 2015/06/13
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur, Trevor Daniels, 2015/06/14
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur, David Kastrup, 2015/06/14
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur,
Trevor Daniels <=
- Re: \dim and avoid-slur, Simon Albrecht, 2015/06/14