[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: slur syntax
From: |
Michael Hendry |
Subject: |
Re: slur syntax |
Date: |
Sun, 24 May 2015 11:16:26 +0100 |
> On 23 May 2015, at 23:19, Gianmaria Lari <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Yes! Thank you Peter (and Urs), I think now it's clear!!!!
>
> Lilypond use a "postfix" syntax. To apply a function 'f' to the note 'a' the
> lilypond syntax is "a \f" and not viceversa. Because the open parenthese is
> like a function (a function that marks the first item) it must be written as
> for all the other function: after the note.
>
> Of course, everything is possible, and we could make the lilypond parser
> more complex and use the other notation for the slur issue. But this has
> been considered not important :)
>
…and to be consistent, you’d also have to change the way a tilde is used to
signify a tie, which current connects the note it follows to the note it
precedes.
Michael
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/slur-syntax-tp176928p176957.html
> Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- slur syntax, Gianmaria Lari, 2015/05/23
- Re: slur syntax, Urs Liska, 2015/05/23
- Re: slur syntax, Gianmaria Lari, 2015/05/23
- Re: slur syntax, Peter Bjuhr, 2015/05/23
- Re: slur syntax, Peter Bjuhr, 2015/05/23
- Re: slur syntax, Gianmaria Lari, 2015/05/23
- Re: slur syntax,
Michael Hendry <=
- Re: slur syntax, David Kastrup, 2015/05/24
- Re: slur syntax, Gianmaria Lari, 2015/05/25