Re: Is GridLY the future?

[Werner LEMBERG]

>> This is what I meant with `defending your code'.  And sometimes it
>> simply happens that there is no concensus.
> 
> I hope you simply didn't read Janek's comment carefully enough.  The
> main point in his last sentence is not about the alternative but
> about an attitude of rejecting suggestions simply because one
> doesn't understand their use case.  Which *is* off-putting in a
> non-constructive manner that can't really be justified with
> "defeding code".

Hmm, OK.  It's a bit hard for me to see the fine distinction – you
have to convince the other developer(s) in both situations, which
might be a long and exhausting process –, but I acknowledge that the
difference is important to you, Janek, and maybe other contributors.


    Werner