[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Jianpu Notation
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Jianpu Notation |
Date: |
Fri, 01 May 2015 09:43:35 +0200 (CEST) |
> "Negative values will flip or mirror the stencil without changing
> its origin; this may result in collisions unless the scaled stencil
> is realigned"
>
> I’ll have to give this a try.
>
> Would it be worth defining “flip” functions that call
> ly:stencil-scale with negative, non-scaling, numbers (i.e. -1) ?
IMHO, no.
> That would be more discoverable and result in clearer code.
Regarding `more discoverable': I guess that there are missing cross
reference entries
> And/or the doc string for ly:stencil-scale could indicate that it
> can be used in this way, currently it only says:
>
> "Scale stil using the horizontal and vertical scaling factors x
> and y."
This certainly makes sense. Can you provide a patch?
Werner
- Re: Jianpu Notation,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Jianpu Notation, Paul Morris, 2015/05/01
- Message not available
- Re: Jianpu Notation, Paul Morris, 2015/05/03
- Re: Jianpu Notation, MING TSANG, 2015/05/05
- Re: Jianpu Notation, MING TSANG, 2015/05/06
- Re: Jianpu Notation, Paul Morris, 2015/05/06
- Re: Jianpu Notation, MING TSANG, 2015/05/06