lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: teaching a university module on engraving with lilypond


From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: teaching a university module on engraving with lilypond
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:58:42 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0

Hi Kevin,

Am 27.04.2015 um 16:18 schrieb Kevin Barry:
Dear All,

Three recent threads (are we the future, mutopia, and new users' feelings about the docs) have prompted me to start a new one rather than write separate replies to each. Apologies in advance for the length, but I would be very grateful for some replies.

I am very happy to say that a module I offered at the university where I teach, on preparing scores with lilypond, has been taken up by the students (whether the course runs or not is their choice so I consider it a democratic victory!), and will run for twelve weeks this forthcoming October-December. I will have about ten sophister B.A. students (music students at the end of their degrees).


Congratulations!

The scope of the course will be to teach some of the finer points of engraving (Gould is the module reference text) and then get them to produce their own editions of out-of-copyright scores which we will then try to upload to mutopia (and perhaps imslp, but I haven't looked into that).

So a few things:

1. I'm viewing this as an opportunity to `turn' a few of our students (who mostly seem to use pirated copies of Sibelius). I haven't researched the module yet but I hope that I will have some exemplary scores to show off LilyPond when the time comes around. The only commercially available one that I am aware of is Urs and Janek's Fried songbook. (By the way, I read in another thread that they sold framed A3 pages from it - are they still doing that? I would love one) If anyone can point me in the direction of more LilyPond-engraved material that would be great.

What I know from the community is
https://edition-kainhofer.com/de/ and
http://www.xn--schne-noten-tfb.de/

The framed A3 pages were an item in our (failed) crowdfunding initiative to make the edition free. As nobody took that one we didn't actually produce one, so nothing is "in stock". However, one could always think about that.


2. There seems to be a consensus among a small group here that LilyPond's default output isn't really publishing standard.

Definitely not. But I don't think *any* notation program does that. IMO LilyPond's default output is much closer to publishing standard than Finale's or Sibelius' (I don't know about Amadeus or SCORE).

But there are two different things to this topic: The overall layout and appearance and the detail engraving issues.
The latter is the question of how many items you have to touch and fix to get the details to your publication standards, the former the issue of global settings.

I've never engraved a full score with it (I do examples and diagrams for my own work or the work of other academics), so I've never really bumped up against this issue. Can anyone list the things that they routinely improve? I know Kieran and some others proposed creating some stylesheets to help in this area (and somewhere I have a very nice engraving of the first page of Beethoven's Op. 10 sonatas) - was there any progress with that?

Partially.
There is at least the place ready for it in openLilyLib, and some thought has been given about a possible interface and code design - but not too much. This is "blocked" by my work on font selection. I've written about my progress on a font selection interface in this post: http://lilypondblog.org/2015/03/managing-alternative-fonts-with-lilypond/
But while continuing my work on that track I realized that some if not most of the work should go into LilyPond itself. So currently I'm preparing a patch that will significantly simplify and enhance the possibilities to switch text and music fonts in LilyPond. Only when that's ready and through I will continue with the stylesheets library (not only because of the time but of course because that relies on the font interface).

I think when the time is ready I'll ask for some discussion here.


3. Since I will, in effect, be creating a tutorial for new LilyPond users, perhaps I could encourage some collaboration here, and make the results freely available. MuseScore has an excellent series of tutorial videos, for example.

You know http://benlemon.me/blog/music/lilypond/operation-lilypond
?

I'm not necessarily saying that format would be best for LilyPond, but I do think there is room in the ecosystem for a tutorial in addition to the (excellent) learning manual, which I paid a considerable price in terms of time for not reading more thoroughly the first time around...

Definitely. If someone takes responsibility for this it would be great.

Urs


Thanks for reading,
Kevin


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]