[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows performance
|
From: |
Keith OHara |
|
Subject: |
Re: Windows performance |
|
Date: |
Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:36:49 +0000 (UTC) |
|
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes:
>
> Trevor Daniels <t.daniels <at> treda.co.uk> writes:
>
> > >>> Phil Holmes wrote Thursday, April 16, 2015 2:00 PM
> > >>>
> > >>>> The performance of LilyPond 2.19.18 on Windows is _much_ better than
> > >>>> previous versions. Some examples:
> On Linux, I see no measurable change (on music without lyrics).
>
Well, the change I was testing was between versions of LilyPond itself,
since I'm set up to compile Lilypond on Linux, and I didn't upgrade
the Pango or Ghostscript packages.
- Re: Windows performance, (continued)
- Re: Windows performance, Paul Morris, 2015/04/16
- Re: Windows performance, Andrew Bernard, 2015/04/16
- Re: Windows performance, Cynthia Karl, 2015/04/16
- Re: Windows performance, Trevor Daniels, 2015/04/18
- Re: Windows performance, Keith OHara, 2015/04/18
- Re: Windows performance,
Keith OHara <=
- Re: Windows performance, Martin Tarenskeen, 2015/04/18