lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Beam subdivision


From: tisimst
Subject: Re: Beam subdivision
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:52:05 -0700 (MST)

The other question the OP was asking is can the group default to have TWO full beams across the group, while the pairs of 32nd notes are beamed together with a third. It seems like non-standard notation, so quick, generic solutions for any size of group, outside of a function like the one already proposed, may not exist. I had a look through the IR and couldn't find anything that says it will only use a SINGLE beam across the whole group. 

- Abraham

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 10, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Stephen MacNeil [via Lilypond] <[hidden email]> wrote:

\version "2.18.2"


\relative c'' {


% this should be all you need

% if you use \once you can aply it any time


\once \set subdivideBeams = ##t

\set baseMoment = #(ly:make-moment 1/20)

\tuplet 5/4 {


% no square brackets needed


e,32 c' bes e d bes' g d' d, aes'

}


% without


\tuplet 5/4 {

e,32 c' bes e d bes' g d' d, aes'

}


% with


\once \set subdivideBeams = ##t

\tuplet 5/4 {

e,32 c' bes e d bes' g d' d, aes'

}

}




_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Beam-subdivision-tp172911p172923.html
To start a new topic under User, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here.
NAML


View this message in context: Re: Beam subdivision
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]