Re: Strange "d.g." notation

lilypond-user

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Strange "d.g." notation

From:	David Nalesnik
Subject:	Re: Strange "d.g." notation
Date:	Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:04:03 -0600

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Menu Jacques <address@hidden> wrote:

Hello David and Pierre,

The instrument name is actually "Viola da gamba (Viola) », so you’re probably right : the octaviation would be done only if one plays specifically the voila da gamba and not the modern alto.

It looks like a number of his quartets are available in manuscript or 18th century editions at IMSLP. Maybe this one is there.

--David

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Strange "d.g." notation, Menu Jacques, 2015/02/16
- Re: Strange "d.g." notation, David Nalesnik, 2015/02/16
- Re: Strange "d.g." notation, Brian Barker, 2015/02/16
  - Re: Strange "d.g." notation, Simon Albrecht, 2015/02/16
  - Re: Strange "d.g." notation, Menu Jacques, 2015/02/16
- Message not available
  - Re: Strange "d.g." notation, Menu Jacques, 2015/02/16
    - Re: Strange "d.g." notation, David Nalesnik <=
    - Re: Strange "d.g." notation, Menu Jacques, 2015/02/16
    - Re: Strange "d.g." notation, David Nalesnik, 2015/02/16
- Re: Strange "d.g." notation, RomanticStrings, 2015/02/17
  - Re: Strange "d.g." notation, Jacques Menu, 2015/02/17

Prev by Date: Re: Strange "d.g." notation
Next by Date: Re: Strange "d.g." notation
Previous by thread: Re: Strange "d.g." notation
Next by thread: Re: Strange "d.g." notation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread