Re: Problem with r2. in two voices

[Simon Albrecht]

Am 08.02.2015 21:32, schrieb Kevin Barry:

On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Cynthia Karl <address@hidden> wrote:

But I don’t want to make it visually that there are two voices here, I want to make it visually explicit that there is a single voice.  That’s why each voice has issued the \oneVoice command before asserting the r2.  And why is it only rests and notes that have augmentation dots are affected in \oneVoice mode this way? There is no way other than clashing note column warnings to tell that two voices have each issued concurrent rests in \oneVoice mode.  It’s just kind of weird that augmentation dots get this special treatment.

I think you are misusing \oneVoice here;

Indeed the name of the command makes perfectly clear that it’s contradictory and nonsensical (and lily basically requires to be given sensible input) to write \oneVoice and have two voices all the same. Too much noise for such a basic misconception!

Yours, Simon

it isn't for merging things into a single voice, but rather for telling LilyPond that there is only one voice that it needs to position on the staff. If you are still `feeding' it two (or more) voices you will have to do some extra work to tell LilyPond what to do or you will get errors and/or unintended output.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user