[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.19.15 slur accidental collision (Paul Scott)
From: |
Paul Scott |
Subject: |
Re: 2.19.15 slur accidental collision (Paul Scott) |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Feb 2015 13:32:48 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 06:35:34AM +1100, Nick Payne wrote:
> On 01/02/2015 13:15, Cynthia Karl wrote:
> >>Message: 2
> >>Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 13:31:14 -0700
> >>From: Paul Scott <address@hidden>
> >>To: address@hidden
> >>Subject: 2.19.15 slur accidental collision
> >>Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I am trying to make a slur not collide with an accidental. Reading the
> >>Learning Manual I find how to do:
> >>
> >
> >\version "2.19.15"
> >
> >\relative{
> >\shape #'((-1.2 . 2.9) (0 . 2) (0 . 2) (0 . 0)) Slur
> >f'8( bes4)
> >}
>
> Surely in this situation the simplest and most attractive option is to
> reverse the direction of the slur:
>
> \version "2.19.15"
>
> \relative{
> f'8_( bes4)
> }
After seeing the results of the original answer to my question reversing
the slur direction is what I ended up doing.
I wasn't aware that slur direction could be changed with "_" as
articulations can. I used \slurDown and \slurNeutral.
The original that I am making a new part from neatly attached the
beginning of the slur to the top of the flag of the first note.
I wonder if the \shape solution above would have to be recalculated for each
new situation.
Thank you,
Paul