Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration

[tyronicus]

I am all in favor of the collaboration, but I wonder if I might
pessimistically ask why we use so many discrete projects and repositories.

It seems to me that we could accomplish much more by using one git project
instead of having openlilylib, the LSR, and our newest projects, ScholarLY
and GASP. On top of all these projects, I've noticed that a few LP users
have their own repos of snippets and tools.

Wouldn't the beginning to intermediate user of LilyPond be benefited by the
ability to find all of these resources under one roof? Even the advanced
user might more willingly contribute to the various projects if they were
all right there in front of him/her.

Assuming it is an idea of the different projects having separate 'missions,'
why not broaden our horizons?

I hope I haven't angered anyone who fills differently than I do. These are
just the thoughts of an admitted beginner.



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/ScholarLY-introduction-and-call-for-collaboration-tp171140p171149.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.