[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles
From: |
Gilberto Agostinho |
Subject: |
Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Jul 2014 06:29:46 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi David,
David Nalesnik-2 wrote
> No :) (And I should probably take a lesson from some of my own music...)
Same here, when I first saw your proposition I was also surprised with the
default behaviour of LilyPond, but then by checking some of my own scores
for the "annoying repeated accidentals" after rests, I realized that they
were pretty much always necessary!
Take care,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Accidentals-on-repeated-notes-separated-by-rests-in-certain-styles-tp164462p164489.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/14
- Message not available
- Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/15
- Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles, David Kastrup, 2014/07/15
- Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/15
- Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/15
- Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/15
- Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles, Gilberto Agostinho, 2014/07/15
- Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles, David Nalesnik, 2014/07/15
- Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles,
Gilberto Agostinho <=