[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Horizontalized scores
From: |
Chris Crossen |
Subject: |
RE: Horizontalized scores |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:13:57 -0700 |
> Chris Crossen <address@hidden> wrote:
> > The trick to getting the crisp horizontal and vertical lines while
> > still getting anti-aliased curves is the ghostscript option -
> dGraphicsAlphaBits.
> > When Lilypond produces a .png file it set this to 4. If you set it to
> > 1 instead, you get horizontal and vertical lines that aren't
anti-aliased.
> >
> > I have attached two images showing the difference. crisp.png was
> > produced with -dGraphicsAlphaBits=1 and blurry.png was produced with
> > -dGraphicsAlphaBits=4.
> Tim Roberts:
> But did you notice that the stems in your PNG are not all the same
thickness?
> The G and A stems are 1 pixel, and the rest are 2 pixels.
> Is that an acceptable trade-off for you?
>
> --
The stem width differences aren't a problem for me. But, in an earlier post,
David Kastrup pointed out that the circles around string numbers are not
anti-aliased and are very jaggy.
I think I'll continue using GIMP to extract the images from PDFs.
- Re: Horizontalized scores, (continued)
- Re: Horizontalized scores, Noeck, 2014/02/14
- RE: Horizontalized scores, Chris Crossen, 2014/02/15
- Re: Horizontalized scores, David Kastrup, 2014/02/16
- Re: Horizontalized scores, karl, 2014/02/16
- RE: Horizontalized scores, Chris Crossen, 2014/02/16
- Re: Horizontalized scores, David Kastrup, 2014/02/16
- RE: Horizontalized scores, Chris Crossen, 2014/02/17
- Re: Horizontalized scores, David Kastrup, 2014/02/17
- RE: Horizontalized scores, Chris Crossen, 2014/02/17
RE: Horizontalized scores, Tim Roberts, 2014/02/18
- RE: Horizontalized scores,
Chris Crossen <=
Re: Horizontalized scores, Chris Crossen, 2014/02/18