Re: LilyPond editing environments

[Janek Warchoł]

2013/12/9 Urs Liska <address@hidden>:
> Hi,
>
> I have a few questions about the contents of the "Easier editing" page on
> lilypond.org.
>
> a)
> LilyPondTool.
> The link is broken, and http://lilypondtool.blogspot.de/ states (as of
> 2012-09-14) that development of LilyPondTool is stopped.
> Should I move it to the " Other programs not being actively developed"
> section?

absolutely!

> b)
> What is the reason that Tunefl is the topmost item in this list
> Shouldn't we instead add a new subsection for Online tools?
> - Tunefl
> - Schikker's list
> - lilybin
> - more?
> I would even add the MediaWiki extension to Wikipedia there.

Hard to say.  And I think there was some licensing problem with
Lilybin (it may not be fully free, and as GNU we cannot recommend
non-free programs).

But i agree that Frescobaldi should be on top, then Denemo, and then
Tunefl (as it does allow only to create small scores).
Janek