[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: string->number scheme
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: string->number scheme |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:58:33 +0100 |
So, to answer David's question:
2013/11/13 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> You could start by explaining what is wrong with the solution at the
> bottom of
> <URL:http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-11/msg00456.html>.
This is not doing what Stjepan wants because he cannot use \bpm as a
value for a header field.
See this bug:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3658
I believe that to solve Stjepan's problem we'd have to solve this bug.
best,
Janek
- Re: string->number scheme, (continued)
- Re: string->number scheme, Stjepan Horvat, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme, Stjepan Horvat, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme, David Kastrup, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme, Stjepan Horvat, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme, David Kastrup, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme, Stjepan Horvat, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme, David Kastrup, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme, Stjepan Horvat, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme, Stjepan Horvat, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme, Janek Warchoł, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: string->number scheme, Stjepan Horvat, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme, Stjepan Horvat, 2013/11/13
- Re: string->number scheme, Janek Warchoł, 2013/11/13