[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Nov 2013 23:05:21 +0100 |
Hi Gilberto,
2013/11/8 Gilberto Agostinho <address@hidden>:
> Hi Janek,
>
> I showed him two scores of mine, one with default settings for size, and the
> had #(set-global-staff-size 18)
ok, thanks. I supposed smaller staffsize (such problems are more
visible with small sizes).
> As for your suggestion of whiting-out the staff lines on the gaps, I think
> that this could look bad. My guess is that it would make the notes to appear
> to "float" above the staff, and it would make reading more difficult.
I don't think so. Everything depends on the font-size, beam
thickness, staffline thickness etc...
look here:
http://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ImagefromIndex/16973 (6MB)
imo it looks very good.
cheers,
Janek
- Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing, (continued)
- Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing, Janek Warchoł, 2013/11/11
- Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing, Noeck, 2013/11/12
- Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing, Gilberto Agostinho, 2013/11/09
- Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing, Peter Bjuhr, 2013/11/10
- Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing, Gilberto Agostinho, 2013/11/10
- Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing, Janek Warchoł, 2013/11/08
- Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing, Gilberto Agostinho, 2013/11/08
- Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing, Gilberto Agostinho, 2013/11/08
Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing, Patrick or Cynthia Karl, 2013/11/10