[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
missing bar numbers after manual line breaks within incomplete measures:
From: |
pls |
Subject: |
missing bar numbers after manual line breaks within incomplete measures: bug or feature? |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Oct 2013 16:17:13 +0200 |
Hey all,
according to the NR "bar numbers are typeset by default at the start of every
line except the first line". In the following example the second line starts
with an incomplete measure which automatically results in a missing bar number.
I would expect a bar number at the beginning of the next complete measure.
What's the common practice here? Gould just generally recommends to "place bar
numbers at the beginning of each system" but she doesn't say anything about
lines starting with an incomplete measure. (I know the commands to make bar
numbers visible.)
\version "2.17.26"
{
\repeat unfold 4 {c'1} c'2 \bar ""
\break
c'2
\repeat unfold 20 {c'1}
}
tia
patrick
- missing bar numbers after manual line breaks within incomplete measures: bug or feature?,
pls <=