On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:12 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 23.07.2013 15:09, schrieb Richard Shann:
> On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 14:03 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Am 20.07.2013 17:57, schrieb Richard Shann:
>>
>>> I have been compiling some examples of LilyPond's typesetting
>>> compared
>>> with those of well-known alternatives:
>>>
>>> http://denemo.org/CompareScorewriters
>>>
>>> If anyone can provide better examples - these are just taken from
>>> published work that I could find with a quick search - then please
>>> let
>>> me know - especially if I am not doing LilyPond justice.
>>> My examples have a common origin in MusicXML files, but there may be
>>> some other way of standardizing the comparisons (short of re-typing
>>> music examples...).
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lilypond-user mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>> What about the LilyPond and Finale renderings on that page:
>>
http://lilypond.ursliska.de/notensatz/lilypond-tutorials/tackle-complex-tasks/part-2-improving-the-output.html?
> Reading this page I see you refer to "the model" but it is not so clear
> what this is
In this case the printed score from which I typeset the example with
LilyPond and someone else with Finale 2008.
Ah, I see, you are able to talk about "Enter the plain music, correctly
assign voices and don't apply any manual corrections" in the context of
Finale - with many such programs you cannot certain markings or text
without manually positioning it, it just floats at the end of the mouse
pointer until you click.