lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fatal bug in strftime?


From: Peter Toye
Subject: Re: Fatal bug in strftime?
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 14:38:12 +0100

David,

I'm sorry, but this doesn't help much. I know nothing about GUILE
and have no contact with them.

I agree that this may not be a Lilypond bug, and that you
have better things to do than debug someone else's code
(don't we all?) - but how does one flag this sort of thing
up.

Best regards,

Peter
mailto:address@hidden
www.ptoye.com

-------------------------
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 13:18:55 +0200
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Fatal bug in strftime?
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain

> "address@hidden" <address@hidden> writes:

>> On 2013-05-11 11:27, Federico Bruni wrote:
>>>
>>> 2013/5/11 Peter Toye <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
>>>
>>>     When I try to use the %e format to get rid of leading zeros in the
>>>     date, lilypond crashes out.
>>>
>>>     \header {
>>>        title = "title"
>>>        composer = "no-one"
>>>        tagline = \markup {
>>>          Engraved
>>>          \simple #(strftime "%e/%m/%Y" (localtime (current-time)))
>>>          with \with-url #"http://lilypond.org/";
>>>          \line { LilyPond \simple #(lilypond-version)
>>>     (http://lilypond.org/) }
>>>        }
>>>     }
>>>
>>>
>>> I cannot reproduce the crash on linux.
>>> Some Windows user should check
>>>
>>
>> I can confirm that on Windows 7 32-bit and Lilypond 2.17.13 it crashes!
>>
>> FATAL: memory error in realloc
>> C:/lilypond/usr/share/lilypond/current/scm/lily.scm
>> Exited with return code 3.

> Well, strftime is not defined by LilyPond.  If anybody is interested in
> getting that bug approached, one should test it in GUILE-1.8.8 (from its
> command prompt, most likely) and GUILE-2.0.9.

> I have my doubts the GUILE team can be interested in releasing anything
> past GUILE-1.8.8, but if the bug can be shown to be present in 2.0.9,
> chances are that a proper report will result in a fixed version by the
> time LilyPond migrates to GUILE-2.0.

> -- 
> David Kastrup




> ------------------------------

> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 13:20:38 +0200
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: many users don't know about \shape
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

> Janek Warcho? <address@hidden> writes:

>> Sure, we're working on it with Urs (progressing slowly).  It'd be nice
>> for LilyPond Report, but frankly i think we should rather create a
>> multi-author blog - it would be easier to keep it active.

> A "multi-author blog" sounds pretty much the same as a journal except
> that it won't accept non-member contributions.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]