[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: multi measure rests
From: |
Evan Driscoll |
Subject: |
Re: Re: multi measure rests |
Date: |
Fri, 03 May 2013 16:25:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 05/03/2013 03:11 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
> I remember and use it this way:
>
> R <length> <times> <so many>
>
> so: R1*3 is three times the length of one whole note. Always calculate
> the total length you need and that it gets there.
FWIW, the general form of what I do is
R1*<time signature>*<number of measures>
So instead of typing "R2.*3" for a three-measure rest in 3/4 time, I
would spell that as "R1*3/4*3". Instead of a full measure of rest in
12/8 being written as "R1.", I would write it as "R1*12/8".
I'll leave out the *<time signature> part for 4/4 time, but everything
else gets written out even if there is a more succinct way of expressing
it. I'll usually leave out the *<number of measures> bit if there's only
one. But the point is I always start with "R1" and then scale as necessary.
BTW, I make no claim that this is particularly good practice or that
you'll like it; I'm not an experienced Lilypond user by any means. (I
got into this habit as I'm very very slowly working on typesetting the
parts to Mars, which of course is in 5/4 time. I'm not sure if there
even is another way to mark a full-measure of rest in 5/4 time without
using a scaling.) I just bring it up to show my own view and also to
point out that you can use * to scale the length of a measure in
addition to specifying multiple measures. (Really they're both doing the
same thing, but I think of them as being for different reasons.)
Evan
Re: multi measure rests, Noeck, 2013/05/03