lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL


From: Shane Brandes
Subject: Re: Lilypond \include statements and the GPL
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:57:43 -0400

Can we all agree now that the law, justice, and licences are three different entities. And it would take the opinion of someone well versed in all three to quiet this ruckus. And furthermore even if we have a "solid" answer from a respected source, either justice or law could still supersede such an opinion if ever put to an legal actual contestation no matter how well worded a licence's permissiveness is worded or then misconstrued. Especially since the licence is contrary to the nature of normal copyright laws which in fact vary from nation state to nation state.

Shane


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <address@hidden> wrote:
On 04/03/2013 01:08 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> Dare I suggest you look at section zero? The second paragraph of which
> says, and I quote:

You're talking about GPL version 2, not GPL version 3.

Compare:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html

... where the second paragraph of Section 0 is exactly as you describe, with:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html

... which is the current and (to this case) relevant version of the GPL.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]