Re: Repeated accidental after tie across line break

[Richard Shann]

On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 13:12 +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Richard Shann
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Dear LilyPonders,
> > When a tied note with accidental ties across a line boundary the
> > accidental is repeated in the next bar. If there is a further note with
> > the same accidental, the accidental is repeated, which looks very odd,
> > as the accidental has already been printed in that bar.
> 
> Do you mean the accidentals on frist quarter notes in each measure,
> i.e. the second accidental here
> 
> \version "2.16.2"
> {
> ees'4 ees'8 ees'4 ees' ees'8 ~
> ees' ees'4 ees' ees' ees'8 ~
> }
> 
> ?
> If so, it's printed because music notation rules say so.  Notation
> rules say that if an altered note is tied across barline, the tied
> part after barline "inherits" accidental, but the following notes
> don't (as the accidental was in the previous measure), so new
> accidental is needed.
> 
> Or do you refer to the accidental after the line break?
The one after the line break (which I called a line boundary in my
original message).
I think it is a bug BTW ...

Richard