[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: R shorthand
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: R shorthand |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:37:16 -0400 |
Hi Evan,
> FWIW the multimeasure rest syntax has been a bit of an annoyance with what
> I've been working on recently (Mars).
First of all, could you please email me the note code for "Mars" when you're
done? I'm working on a wicked-cool Lilypond demo, and "Mars" was exactly the
piece I was considering using for the example — if I could leverage your input
effort, it would be greatly appreciated.
> To me it's quite counter-intuitive that a "full measure rest" can mark any
> durations other than a multiple of a full measure
I can imagine that, somewhere out there, someone uses (e.g.)
R1*15/16 s16\> s1\!
However, this (IMO) is not a compelling enough reason to avoid implementing my
suggested syntax — we should improve Lilypond to the point where such
non-intuitive code as the above is unnecessary.
> the proposed suggestion is a significant local improvement.
Glad to hear!
Cheers,
Kieren.
- R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/19
- Re: R shorthand, Shane Brandes, 2013/03/19
- Re: R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/19
- Re: Re: R shorthand, Evan Driscoll, 2013/03/19
- Re: R shorthand,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/20
- Re: R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/20
- Re: R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/20
- Re: R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/20
- Re: R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/20