|
From: | James Harkins |
Subject: | Re: Proposed new available and recommended behavior of \relative |
Date: | Sat, 9 Mar 2013 13:26:27 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: | Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
> I don't really have a good idea how some kind of voting process would > look like where we get relevant feedback from a substantial number of > non-specialists. FWIW, speaking as a Lilypond user with some programming experience (but who is not a LP developer) -- I was skeptical of the change at first, but I'm wholly convinced by David's point that \relative d'' { d e f } features a redundant d that could be removed from the syntax by \relative { d'' e f }. The fact that it's a new rule doesn't make it a bad rule. I think I would adapt to this syntax easily. hjh
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |