Re: Hushing up Sibelius news?

[David Kastrup]

Adam Spiers <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:51 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Adam Spiers <address@hidden> writes:
>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:22 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Adam Spiers <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>> I just blogged about this:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://blog.adamspiers.org/2013/02/25/music-industry-learns-nothing-from-the-avid-sibelius-saga/
>>>>
>>>> Well, I see some fatally flawed assumptions here, riding on your
>>>> notion "both MuseScore and GNU LilyPond would serve as excellent
>>>> starting points for a world-class music notation product."
>>>>
>>>> Now I can't vouch for MuseScore, but GNU LilyPond is anything but a
>>>> "starting point" for software development.  It is large with an
>>>> elaborate and complex architecture.  And most particularly, an
>>>> architecture that is not the core expertise of the former Sibelius
>>>> development team.
>>>
>>> I don't follow your logic here at all.

And it is clear that you won't, so we might as well call it a day.
Anybody actually interested in the argument has had ample opportunity to
make himself acquainted with our reasonings.

-- 
David Kastrup