[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:23:45 +0100 (CET) |
>> I still don't understand, sorry. What do you mean with `fatten'?
>
> Horizontal padding. Everything appears to stick out to the left and
> right more than it actually does.
Aaah. The keyword for me is `horizontal'. Thanks! The images from
issue #1290 should be added somehow to the documentation...
Werner
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, (continued)
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam,
Werner LEMBERG <=