[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sophisticated SystemStartBar callback needed
From: |
Phil Holmes |
Subject: |
Re: sophisticated SystemStartBar callback needed |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Jan 2013 10:27:25 -0000 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kieren MacMillan" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Lilypond-User Mailing List" <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: sophisticated SystemStartBar callback needed
Hi Phil,
Why do you need the line at all? I've never seen a vocal score anything
like that, and I have seen quite a few.
With only a very quick scan of my library, I turned up about a dozen that
have a bar for the vox — they're mostly musical theatre scores (e.g., Les
Miz, Sweeney Todd, Light In The Piazza, etc.), though some are "traditional"
scores.
============================================================
Aah. I don't do MT :-)
============================================================
Gould says it shouldn't be there. Soloists = single line on the left.
Chorus = bracket.
1. As both conductor and engraver, I find the "loose staves" quite a
distraction; the barred group is superior to my eye (and, apparently, to the
engravers of the scores mentioned above).
2. Notation evolves to better service the needs of performers — just because
Gould says something, doesn't make it so. ;)
============================================================
Agreed. She's good guidance though.
If I had to do what you're trying to do, I think I'd simply make 2 staves of
chorus: "chorus with solos" and "chorus no solos" and let lilypond lose the
relevant one at the relevant time.
============================================================
--
Phil Holmes