[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:26:10 -0500 |
Hi Frédéric,
> I see that one could prefer it being aligned with time signature.
It's not so much a "preference" as standard notational practice — see Gould or
any other engraving reference for more specifics.
> Thanks for pointing this.
No problem.
I hope you saw the fix that Thomas posted; it works perfectly.
Cheers,
Kieren.
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, (continued)
Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, address@hidden, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Frédéric Bron, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Thomas Morley, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/17
Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Frédéric Bron, 2012/12/17
Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?,
Kieren MacMillan <=