[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: F-flat Key Signature
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: F-flat Key Signature |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:43:15 +0200 |
2012/9/19 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Tarenskeen"
> <address@hidden>
> To: "keith Luke" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Lilypond-user" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 10:03 AM
> Subject: Re: F-flat Key Signature
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, keith Luke wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone know why the flats appear our of order when the key signature
>>> is F-flat?
>>
>>
>> Not an answer to your question, but why are the flats to big and don't fit
>> the staff, making them hard to read ?
>
>
>
> User preference - the staff is a non-standard size, it would appear.
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Image:
http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fes-dur
Theoretical text (in german):
http://books.google.de/books?id=D6ZZFHIuQ54C&pg=PA68&lpg=PA68&ots=oEy-27k2LK&dq=fes-dur&hl=de
-Harm
- F-flat Key Signature, keith Luke, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Martin Tarenskeen, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Mark Knoop, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Urs Liska, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Vaughan McAlley, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, David Nalesnik, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Urs Liska, 2012/09/19
- Re: F-flat Key Signature, Mark Knoop, 2012/09/19
Re: F-flat Key Signature, David Rogers, 2012/09/19