Re: Appreciation / Financial support

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 03/06/12 17:44, David Kastrup wrote:
> I don't want to remove "as much C++ as possible".  That's about as
> useful as to remove "as much C as possible" from Emacs.  The point is to
> consider C++ as the building language for primitives, and tie together
> the primitives in Scheme.

OK, I misinterpreted your remarks somewhat.  I had read them as meaning that 
(besides re-architecting things so that control flow etc. was organized from 
within Scheme) you wanted to strip out the object-oriented side of things and 
move that over to Scheme, so that what was currently C++ would be pared back to 
being fairly pure C.