lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: is shapeSlur broken?


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: is shapeSlur broken?
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:56:06 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux)

David Nalesnik <address@hidden> writes:

> Should be just around the corner!

We just had another fix for a critical regression in, and I marked
updating the \footnote documentation to \footnote behavior (\footnote is
now used as a postevent consistently) also as Critical.  Once the
release candidate gets out, we have a delay of two weeks for other
critical regressions to be found.

I certainly hope that we get through that without new regressions being
found, but it is not like that hope would be particularly novel.

-- 
David Kastrup




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]