[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is shapeSlur broken?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: is shapeSlur broken? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2012 13:56:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Nalesnik <address@hidden> writes:
> Should be just around the corner!
We just had another fix for a critical regression in, and I marked
updating the \footnote documentation to \footnote behavior (\footnote is
now used as a postevent consistently) also as Critical. Once the
release candidate gets out, we have a delay of two weeks for other
critical regressions to be found.
I certainly hope that we get through that without new regressions being
found, but it is not like that hope would be particularly novel.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, (continued)
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Urs Liska, 2012/05/08
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Urs Liska, 2012/05/09
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Nalesnik, 2012/05/09
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2012/05/10
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Urs Liska, 2012/05/10
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Thomas Morley, 2012/05/10
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Thomas Morley, 2012/05/10
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Nalesnik, 2012/05/10
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Thomas Morley, 2012/05/10
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Nalesnik, 2012/05/11
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Kastrup, 2012/05/11
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Nalesnik, 2012/05/11
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Urs Liska, 2012/05/11
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2012/05/14
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Kastrup, 2012/05/14
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2012/05/14
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Kastrup, 2012/05/14